How many church leaders does it take to change a lightbulb?
I’m not sure, but in many churches it takes 50 percent or more of the sitting board members to make virtually every decision. And there’s a church growth correlation that shows the more leaders involved in management decisions, the smaller the church’s potential.
Case in point: Small church has a problem with its existing insurance company. The company refuses to grant a rider to cover an outside group to use the church building – a group that would likely have brought in a steady stream of visitors to the church’s programming. When it’s time for the policy to renew, the pastor recommended changing companies to one widely used by the denomination (including insuring the denominational facilities) because they were less expensive and have a liberal rider policy. Seems like a slam dunk and the board approves the change.
Now, for the record, changing insurance carriers shouldn’t have been a board decision in the first place. The property committee or the church’s executive team (officers) in a healthy growing church would have made and executed this decision without board input or approval. But in a church destined to remain small, there is a core belief that “everyone” is entitled to being a part of any (and virtually every) decision.
Back to the case in point. When it came time to make the switch, the church’s leadership became paralyzed because a member of the church works at the church’s existing insurance agency. By the end of the week, the decision to change companies became a referendum on personalities rather than a sound business decision that supported the church’s mission and vision.
Small Church Thinking stifles congregations and limits a church’s growth potential.
Members matter more than mission
Everybody’s opinion is equally valid
Everyone’s opinion deserves to be heard and considered
Majority rules … except when a minority objects
Peace at any cost
There are other Small Church Thinking points, such as the belief that everyone should know everyone else at a church (thus guaranteeing a church cannot grow much beyond 100), but the above are germane to the case in point.
Decision making is a key indicator of a church’s potential. Good decision making practices won’t necessarily grow a church, but poor decision making practices guarantees a church’s inability to grow.
What other small church thinking points are you aware of? Share with us in the Comment section below.
Leading a small church is difficult in the best of times … let alone in these post-pandemic days. Pastors have been using a wide variety of tools and programs designed to grow their churches, but they’ve been finding it difficult to get any traction. The problem isn’t the tools and programs – most of them are really good – but most of us pastors weren’t taught how to inspire, motivate, and lead a congregation in this fast-changing culture.
The Next Level Coaching Network was developed to help you, Pastor, develop your God-given gifts and talents so you can move your church from the plateau or even from a decline into effective, sustainable growth.
The Next Level Coaching Network includes
Six months of training and support
In depth leadership training videos
Monthly group coaching
One on One coaching
Weekly accountability
The Next Level Coaching Network is our advanced Master Group that builds on your leadership style and …
Gives you a clear plan and path to reach your goals
Resets your priorities so you can focus on the important rather than the urgent
Gives you the tools and the bandwidth to get more done in less time
Maximizes both life and church transformation
Rekindles your job satisfaction
Don’t take our word for it, hear from our clients …
Is Your Church Destined for Smallness?
How many church leaders does it take to change a lightbulb?
I’m not sure, but in many churches it takes 50 percent or more of the sitting board members to make virtually every decision. And there’s a church growth correlation that shows the more leaders involved in management decisions, the smaller the church’s potential.
Church Growth Corollary: The more leaders involved in day-to-day decisions, the less the church's potential @billtb. Share on XCase in point: Small church has a problem with its existing insurance company. The company refuses to grant a rider to cover an outside group to use the church building – a group that would likely have brought in a steady stream of visitors to the church’s programming. When it’s time for the policy to renew, the pastor recommended changing companies to one widely used by the denomination (including insuring the denominational facilities) because they were less expensive and have a liberal rider policy. Seems like a slam dunk and the board approves the change.
Now, for the record, changing insurance carriers shouldn’t have been a board decision in the first place. The property committee or the church’s executive team (officers) in a healthy growing church would have made and executed this decision without board input or approval. But in a church destined to remain small, there is a core belief that “everyone” is entitled to being a part of any (and virtually every) decision.
Back to the case in point. When it came time to make the switch, the church’s leadership became paralyzed because a member of the church works at the church’s existing insurance agency. By the end of the week, the decision to change companies became a referendum on personalities rather than a sound business decision that supported the church’s mission and vision.
Small Church Thinking stifles congregations and limits a church's growth potential. @billtb Share on XSmall Church Thinking stifles congregations and limits a church’s growth potential.
There are other Small Church Thinking points, such as the belief that everyone should know everyone else at a church (thus guaranteeing a church cannot grow much beyond 100), but the above are germane to the case in point.
Decision making is a key indicator of a church’s potential. Good decision making practices won’t necessarily grow a church, but poor decision making practices guarantees a church’s inability to grow.
You Might Like:
What other small church thinking points are you aware of? Share with us in the Comment section below.
Leading a small church is difficult in the best of times … let alone in these post-pandemic days. Pastors have been using a wide variety of tools and programs designed to grow their churches, but they’ve been finding it difficult to get any traction. The problem isn’t the tools and programs – most of them are really good – but most of us pastors weren’t taught how to inspire, motivate, and lead a congregation in this fast-changing culture.
The Next Level Coaching Network was developed to help you, Pastor, develop your God-given gifts and talents so you can move your church from the plateau or even from a decline into effective, sustainable growth.
The Next Level Coaching Network includes
The Next Level Coaching Network is our advanced Master Group that builds on your leadership style and …
Don’t take our word for it, hear from our clients …
Recent Posts
Common Member Retention Challenges + How to Solve Them
November 20, 20245 Biblical Lessons Your Children’s Ministry Should Focus On
November 14, 2024Invite People Into Solutions – Not to Church: 4 Tips to Success
November 9, 2024Categories
Meta
Categories